Here's a letter from "Travis Akin, Marion" to the Rockford Register Star about our Illinois Legislature "kicking the can" down the road and concerns about legal reforms in Illinois. Its worth a read:
"Lawmakers left Springfield without taking action on some big-ticket items such as pension reform and gaming expansion, but kicking the can is really nothing new for the Illinois General Assembly. After all, lawmakers have been kicking the can when it comes to lawsuit reform for many years, and this legislative session was no exception.
Illinois is ranked as the nation’s fifth-worst state for legal fairness by the respected research company Harris Interactive. While surrounding states such as Wisconsin, which is just to the north of Rockford has recently passed lawsuit reforms attract more employers, the leaders in the Illinois House and the Senate refuse to even allow lawsuit reforms to get a vote.
The real world consequences of failing to enact meaningful lawsuit reforms are higher unemployment and increased difficulties in attracting new business opportunities.
Approving meaningful lawsuit reforms that restore fairness to our courts would send a message to job creators that Illinois is open for business. The current unemployment rate in Illinois is 9.3 percent, and only Nevada has a higher unemployment rate.
We clearly cannot afford for the “Land of Lincoln” to be viewed as the “Land of Lawsuits” any longer.
— Travis Akin, Marion"
ALSO READ:
[1] Bonds Bonds and More Future Debt in Illinois!
[2] Illinois Is More Than A Deadbeat State!
[3] Government Waste and Spending by District 86 Legislators!
News for Citizens of Illinois' House District 86 (Will County) Concerning Information and the Voting Record of its Illinois House Representative 2012-2014.
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Friday, June 14, 2013
Larry Walsh Jr.'s Anti-Education and Anti-Technology Bill
Larry Walsh Jr. and Gov. Quinn vote YES (and sign) anti-education / anti-technology bill for Illinois.
As Reported on June 2, 2013:
Gov. Pat Quinn signed bill HB 494 (voted YES by Larry Walsh Jr. - D-IL Dist.86 Joliet/Elwood) into law May 24, placing a moratorium on charter schools that include virtual schooling components in school districts other than the Chicago School District.
“HB 494 aims to keep Illinois in the dark,” said Ted Dabrowski, vice president of policy for the Illinois Policy Institute and a volunteer board member for Virtual Learning solutions, in a blog post on the IPI’s website.
“It’s a message to the rest of the nation that Illinois is not ready to embrace the technology that is changing how the world operates.”
There are currently two schools in Chicago that heavily rely on virtual learning: the Youth Connection Charter School, which serves at-risk students, and the Chicago Virtual Charter School (CVCS), which offers an online curriculum for students from kindergarten through grade 12.
[This bill puts a halt on further technology which will assist students at schools with their education needs, courtesy of Walsh Jr. and Gov. Quinn.]
“Everybody realizes that digital technology and online resources can enhance higher education,” said Jason Martin, a journalism professor at DePaul.
“Almost every school uses virtual learning to supplement its curriculum,” said Dabrowski. “Whether it’s a Khan Academy video for algebra or a K12 Inc. module for Chinese, schools across the nation are using virtual learning to deliver student-centered education.”
Blended curriculums that used both online learning and traditional teaching methods showed a modest performance increase, according to a report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education.
The Chronicle of Higher Education predicts that 3.97 million students will enroll in at least one fully online course in 2014.
Its not too hard to understand Walsh Jr.'s vote on this bill seeing that he had no experience in education when elected in November of 2012.
As Reported on June 2, 2013:
Gov. Pat Quinn signed bill HB 494 (voted YES by Larry Walsh Jr. - D-IL Dist.86 Joliet/Elwood) into law May 24, placing a moratorium on charter schools that include virtual schooling components in school districts other than the Chicago School District.
“HB 494 aims to keep Illinois in the dark,” said Ted Dabrowski, vice president of policy for the Illinois Policy Institute and a volunteer board member for Virtual Learning solutions, in a blog post on the IPI’s website.
“It’s a message to the rest of the nation that Illinois is not ready to embrace the technology that is changing how the world operates.”
There are currently two schools in Chicago that heavily rely on virtual learning: the Youth Connection Charter School, which serves at-risk students, and the Chicago Virtual Charter School (CVCS), which offers an online curriculum for students from kindergarten through grade 12.
[This bill puts a halt on further technology which will assist students at schools with their education needs, courtesy of Walsh Jr. and Gov. Quinn.]
“Everybody realizes that digital technology and online resources can enhance higher education,” said Jason Martin, a journalism professor at DePaul.
“Almost every school uses virtual learning to supplement its curriculum,” said Dabrowski. “Whether it’s a Khan Academy video for algebra or a K12 Inc. module for Chinese, schools across the nation are using virtual learning to deliver student-centered education.”
Blended curriculums that used both online learning and traditional teaching methods showed a modest performance increase, according to a report commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education.
The Chronicle of Higher Education predicts that 3.97 million students will enroll in at least one fully online course in 2014.
Its not too hard to understand Walsh Jr.'s vote on this bill seeing that he had no experience in education when elected in November of 2012.
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Larry Walsh Jr. Taxes You Again With Higher Car Insurance Costs
Larry Walsh Jr. Taxes You Again With Higher Car Insurance Costs!
On May 26, 2013, Larry Walsh Jr. in a (70-41) vote, voted YES to raise your car insurance premiums by $75.00, starting in 2015. Isn't that convenient that in a state that has the highest unemployment in the nation, legislator's like Walsh Jr. decide to stick YOU with yet another tax/fee... a rising car insurance bill.
As reported on May 28th and 29th:
"Illinois motorists who carry only the minimum insurance required by law might find themselves paying more for premiums starting in 2015."
"Bob Hunter, insurance director of the Consumer Federation of America, said Illinois raising the minimums will exacerbate problems for people who can barely afford insurance now.
"Raising the required minimum liability insurance to drive a car is very harmful unless the state of Illinois does something to help low- and moderate-income people afford it," Hunter said."
"State Rep. Mike Bost, a Republican from the Carbondale area, voted against the bill. He has heard estimates that it could cost consumers who are currently carrying only minimum insurance up to an additional $75 a year.
While acknowledging that the minimums were set years ago and have not increased, Bost said he is concerned about low-income families in his area, who are already finding it difficult to make ends meet.
He worries that, if they drive without insurance, they'll be breaking the law and also worries that some may choose to not drive, making it more difficult for them to get to work and continue to pay their housing bills and keep food on the table."
In the "insure.com" 2013 rankings of most expensive states for auto insurance, Illinois is ranked at #38 (among the bottom 15 in the nation) with the average cost of $1,322 per year. However, with Illinois currently holding between 9.3 to 9.5% unemployment (the highest unemployment in the nation in May of 2013) more are finding it difficult to afford their insurance (nor the other necessities of Illinois life).
So who's the cheapest state and why are they less expensive than Illinois or other states???
"No. 50: Iowa
Iowa's rural sensibilities help keep rates down in the Hawkeye State, insurance agents say. The population of Des Moines, the largest city, is about 200,000. [Mind you this is a greater population than the City and Township of Joliet, Illinois.]
"I don't think we're as rushed to do things," observes Paul Pohlson, president of the Independent Insurance Agents of Iowa and vice president of Ramsey Weeks in Grinnell.
"I look at other cities I travel to, and I just think we have fewer accidents because people seem to slow down here. Maybe we don't have as much road rage."
In small towns like Grinnell, where Pohlson works, "I'm probably going to know the person that I hit or who hits me in an accident."
People aren't quick to sue one another over car accidents in Iowa, and the culture is fairly conservative, says Terry McDonald, president-elect of the Independent Insurance Agents of Iowa and executive vice president of A.W. Welt Ambrisco Insurance Inc. in Iowa City. "It's not as easy to win over a jury as it can be in another state," he says."
In other states, such as Nevada, increased insurance premiums were proposed there as well, and it was reported: "Insurance lobbyists also testified that if [the then proposed] bill [was to be] approved, the number of uninsured motorists would increase because poor motorists could not afford the higher premiums."
Though an $75 Illinois rate increase may not sound like much (as it will be stretched out throughout a year), its still another $75 out of Illinois citizens pockets. The very same state which has one of the highest gas taxes in the nation (as reported by Forbes Magazine in April 2013):
Here are the ten states that pay the most in state gas taxes:
All this beckons one question... When's the hammering of Illinois citizen's wallets going to stop by this Democrat controlled Illinois General Assembly?
ALSO READ:
Other reasons why car insurance rates rise:
http://www.carsdirect.com/car-insurance/why-do-auto-insurance-rates-increase-despite-no-accidents-or-violations
The idiots raising your car insurance premiums:
http://money.msn.com/auto-insurance/the-idiots-raising-your-car-insurance-insure.aspx
On May 26, 2013, Larry Walsh Jr. in a (70-41) vote, voted YES to raise your car insurance premiums by $75.00, starting in 2015. Isn't that convenient that in a state that has the highest unemployment in the nation, legislator's like Walsh Jr. decide to stick YOU with yet another tax/fee... a rising car insurance bill.
As reported on May 28th and 29th:
"Illinois motorists who carry only the minimum insurance required by law might find themselves paying more for premiums starting in 2015."
"Bob Hunter, insurance director of the Consumer Federation of America, said Illinois raising the minimums will exacerbate problems for people who can barely afford insurance now.
"Raising the required minimum liability insurance to drive a car is very harmful unless the state of Illinois does something to help low- and moderate-income people afford it," Hunter said."
"State Rep. Mike Bost, a Republican from the Carbondale area, voted against the bill. He has heard estimates that it could cost consumers who are currently carrying only minimum insurance up to an additional $75 a year.
While acknowledging that the minimums were set years ago and have not increased, Bost said he is concerned about low-income families in his area, who are already finding it difficult to make ends meet.
He worries that, if they drive without insurance, they'll be breaking the law and also worries that some may choose to not drive, making it more difficult for them to get to work and continue to pay their housing bills and keep food on the table."
In the "insure.com" 2013 rankings of most expensive states for auto insurance, Illinois is ranked at #38 (among the bottom 15 in the nation) with the average cost of $1,322 per year. However, with Illinois currently holding between 9.3 to 9.5% unemployment (the highest unemployment in the nation in May of 2013) more are finding it difficult to afford their insurance (nor the other necessities of Illinois life).
So who's the cheapest state and why are they less expensive than Illinois or other states???
"No. 50: Iowa
Iowa's rural sensibilities help keep rates down in the Hawkeye State, insurance agents say. The population of Des Moines, the largest city, is about 200,000. [Mind you this is a greater population than the City and Township of Joliet, Illinois.]
"I don't think we're as rushed to do things," observes Paul Pohlson, president of the Independent Insurance Agents of Iowa and vice president of Ramsey Weeks in Grinnell.
"I look at other cities I travel to, and I just think we have fewer accidents because people seem to slow down here. Maybe we don't have as much road rage."
In small towns like Grinnell, where Pohlson works, "I'm probably going to know the person that I hit or who hits me in an accident."
People aren't quick to sue one another over car accidents in Iowa, and the culture is fairly conservative, says Terry McDonald, president-elect of the Independent Insurance Agents of Iowa and executive vice president of A.W. Welt Ambrisco Insurance Inc. in Iowa City. "It's not as easy to win over a jury as it can be in another state," he says."
In other states, such as Nevada, increased insurance premiums were proposed there as well, and it was reported: "Insurance lobbyists also testified that if [the then proposed] bill [was to be] approved, the number of uninsured motorists would increase because poor motorists could not afford the higher premiums."
Though an $75 Illinois rate increase may not sound like much (as it will be stretched out throughout a year), its still another $75 out of Illinois citizens pockets. The very same state which has one of the highest gas taxes in the nation (as reported by Forbes Magazine in April 2013):
Here are the ten states that pay the most in state gas taxes:
- New York 50.6
- California 48.7
- Hawaii 47.1
- Connecticut 45.0
- Illinois 39.1
All this beckons one question... When's the hammering of Illinois citizen's wallets going to stop by this Democrat controlled Illinois General Assembly?
ALSO READ:
Other reasons why car insurance rates rise:
http://www.carsdirect.com/car-insurance/why-do-auto-insurance-rates-increase-despite-no-accidents-or-violations
The idiots raising your car insurance premiums:
http://money.msn.com/auto-insurance/the-idiots-raising-your-car-insurance-insure.aspx
Sunday, June 2, 2013
Political Games In The Illinois General Assembly Favors Incumbents And Disregards Voters!
From The Journal Standard (posted in-part):
5/28/13
"Illinois is in terrible shape because of politicians who have run up debt, failed to ensure that there’s enough money to pay bills and made the state unappealing for businesses that might otherwise want to move here.
And those politicians keep getting re-elected. It’s almost impossible for an incumbent to lose. People are dissatisfied with their government, yet the same people get elected year after year.
It doesn’t make sense — unless you know how the game is played. It’s a game that’s rigged, but fortunately there are some reform-minded groups that want to bring fairness into the political arena.
CHANGE Illinois!, a nonpartisan group of civic, business, labor, professional, nonprofit and philanthropic organizations that represent more than 2 million members, is leading an effort to put an amendment on the November 2014 ballot to improve the way state legislative districts are drawn.
Every 10 years, legislative and congressional districts must be redrawn to represent shifts in population after the federal census. It’s been required since the U.S. Supreme Court’s “one person, one vote” decision in 1964. In that landmark case, the court required that legislative districts had to represent equal numbers of people. Every decade, districts were to be redrawn based on the new census results.
In Illinois, as in many states, the process has been mired in partisan politics. At the very beginning of “one person, one vote,” this state couldn’t agree on how to draw legislative districts, resulting in the infamous “bedsheet ballot” of 1964, in which all candidates for House and Senate had to run statewide.
When there was a split in political power, Democrats and Republicans hardly ever agreed on maps. The stalemates were broken by the secretary of state picking a sealed paper envelope out of Abraham Lincoln’s hat or from another container.
The party whose name was drawn got to draw the maps. The Democrats “won” after the 2000 census and didn’t need a hat after the 2010 census because they controlled the governor’s office and both chambers of the General Assembly.
After the 2011 redistricting process, incumbents won 97 percent of their general elections and there was no real competition in two-thirds of the state legislative races in Illinois.
Illinois’ system has the politicians picking the voters rather than the other way around. If the voters had real choices, more of them might show up at the polls and incumbents would not serve life sentences in office.
Good candidates are discouraged from running because they know the odds are against them. In some cases a less-qualified candidate will run, but more likely, the incumbent goes unchallenged.
Because the incumbents are virtually assured of winning, they don’t listen to us because they don’t need to.
It is time to give the power back to the people and to take redistricting out of the hands of the legislative leaders."
We couldn't agree more! You have another chance to make a better choice than Larry Walsh Jr. and Pat McGuire in 2014 and 2016!
5/28/13
"Illinois is in terrible shape because of politicians who have run up debt, failed to ensure that there’s enough money to pay bills and made the state unappealing for businesses that might otherwise want to move here.
And those politicians keep getting re-elected. It’s almost impossible for an incumbent to lose. People are dissatisfied with their government, yet the same people get elected year after year.
It doesn’t make sense — unless you know how the game is played. It’s a game that’s rigged, but fortunately there are some reform-minded groups that want to bring fairness into the political arena.
CHANGE Illinois!, a nonpartisan group of civic, business, labor, professional, nonprofit and philanthropic organizations that represent more than 2 million members, is leading an effort to put an amendment on the November 2014 ballot to improve the way state legislative districts are drawn.
Every 10 years, legislative and congressional districts must be redrawn to represent shifts in population after the federal census. It’s been required since the U.S. Supreme Court’s “one person, one vote” decision in 1964. In that landmark case, the court required that legislative districts had to represent equal numbers of people. Every decade, districts were to be redrawn based on the new census results.
In Illinois, as in many states, the process has been mired in partisan politics. At the very beginning of “one person, one vote,” this state couldn’t agree on how to draw legislative districts, resulting in the infamous “bedsheet ballot” of 1964, in which all candidates for House and Senate had to run statewide.
When there was a split in political power, Democrats and Republicans hardly ever agreed on maps. The stalemates were broken by the secretary of state picking a sealed paper envelope out of Abraham Lincoln’s hat or from another container.
The party whose name was drawn got to draw the maps. The Democrats “won” after the 2000 census and didn’t need a hat after the 2010 census because they controlled the governor’s office and both chambers of the General Assembly.
After the 2011 redistricting process, incumbents won 97 percent of their general elections and there was no real competition in two-thirds of the state legislative races in Illinois.
Illinois’ system has the politicians picking the voters rather than the other way around. If the voters had real choices, more of them might show up at the polls and incumbents would not serve life sentences in office.
Good candidates are discouraged from running because they know the odds are against them. In some cases a less-qualified candidate will run, but more likely, the incumbent goes unchallenged.
Because the incumbents are virtually assured of winning, they don’t listen to us because they don’t need to.
It is time to give the power back to the people and to take redistricting out of the hands of the legislative leaders."
We couldn't agree more! You have another chance to make a better choice than Larry Walsh Jr. and Pat McGuire in 2014 and 2016!
Democrat Illinois House Rep. Larry Walsh Jr. Votes YES To Force Election Commission on Lake County
May 30th, 2013
Larry Walsh Jr., Illinois House Rep. D-IL Dist 86 (who most recently was given a legislative grade of C and Senator Pat McGuire given a legislative grade of D-), votes YES to strip away elections power from citizens of Lake County without their vote, knowledge or input!
From Illinois Review:
"SPRINGFIELD - Lake County voters could be facing a dramatic change in their county's election oversight imposed on them by the Democrat majority in the Illinois House and Senate.
During the last week of the spring session and without notice, the state's Democrats voted to require Lake County to set up a judge-appointed election commission, stripping Lake County's clerk Willard Helander of her election oversight powers. The bill, HB 2418, makes no provisions for Lake County voters to express their opinion on the change that could cost local taxpayers in excess of $600,000.
The move was a surprise for Lake County Clerk Helander and Barrington State Senator Dan Duffy.
"It is a power play, pure and simple ... They pushed this through on the fast track," Duffy told Illinois Review Wednesday.
Helander agreed with Duffy and suggested Lake County voters would not sit still.
"This seems to be ripe for a class action that voters in Lake are singled out and shut out with extensive new costs and no vote on wanting a new layer of government," Helander told Illinois Review."
Not only does HB 2418 force an election commission on Lake County, it includes other election law changes, including expanding access to voter registration from in-person signups to allowing registration via Internet."
Hmmm.... Abuse of power, failure to consider the voice of citizens, voting last minute to rush through policy, taking away power from citizens without their vote... Sounds like Larry Walsh Jr. to me!
District 86 you deserve better than Larry Walsh Jr.
Larry Walsh Jr., Illinois House Rep. D-IL Dist 86 (who most recently was given a legislative grade of C and Senator Pat McGuire given a legislative grade of D-), votes YES to strip away elections power from citizens of Lake County without their vote, knowledge or input!
http://savejolietiyc.blogspot.com |
From Illinois Review:
"SPRINGFIELD - Lake County voters could be facing a dramatic change in their county's election oversight imposed on them by the Democrat majority in the Illinois House and Senate.
During the last week of the spring session and without notice, the state's Democrats voted to require Lake County to set up a judge-appointed election commission, stripping Lake County's clerk Willard Helander of her election oversight powers. The bill, HB 2418, makes no provisions for Lake County voters to express their opinion on the change that could cost local taxpayers in excess of $600,000.
The move was a surprise for Lake County Clerk Helander and Barrington State Senator Dan Duffy.
"It is a power play, pure and simple ... They pushed this through on the fast track," Duffy told Illinois Review Wednesday.
Helander agreed with Duffy and suggested Lake County voters would not sit still.
"This seems to be ripe for a class action that voters in Lake are singled out and shut out with extensive new costs and no vote on wanting a new layer of government," Helander told Illinois Review."
Not only does HB 2418 force an election commission on Lake County, it includes other election law changes, including expanding access to voter registration from in-person signups to allowing registration via Internet."
Hmmm.... Abuse of power, failure to consider the voice of citizens, voting last minute to rush through policy, taking away power from citizens without their vote... Sounds like Larry Walsh Jr. to me!
District 86 you deserve better than Larry Walsh Jr.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)